Microsoft to buy LinkedIn for $26 billion
BR>
Microsoft announces an all-cash deal for LinkedIn, paying a 50% premium over Friday’s closing price.
…read more
Source: Microsoft to buy LinkedIn for $26 billion
BR>
Microsoft announces an all-cash deal for LinkedIn, paying a 50% premium over Friday’s closing price.
…read more
Source: Microsoft to buy LinkedIn for $26 billion
BR>
By Tyler Durden
This week, the market’s attention will be mostly focused on this week’s two key central bank meetings, namely the Fed on Wednesday and the BOJ on Thursday.
Fed officials’ meeting, on Tuesday and Wednesday, will conclude with release of their latest interest-rate decision, economic projections and a press conference with Chairwoman Janet Yellen. Earlier in the year, the meeting was considered a likely time for the central bank to raise its benchmark interest rate. Alas, with reality refusing to comply with the recovery “narrative”, that possibility has been dashed when the latest jobs report showed a sharp slowdown in May hiring. Still, the projections and press conference will be parsed for clues for when a rate increase could come.
Elsewhere, with the Yen soaring to the highest levels since June, and getting danerously close to the USDJPY 100 level, at which the BOJ may have no choice but to boost its QE, perhaps in the form of buying even more equities via ETF purchases; one thing that is almost certain will not happen is further rate cuts now that global revulsion to NIRP has forced central banks to turn their back on this particular experiment approach.
A quick rundown of day by day events:
Source: Key Events In The Coming Busy Week
BR>
By Tyler Durden
Just last week we were commenting on the unprecedented level of complacency ahead of a plethora of June event catalysts, key among which the June 23 Brexit referendum vote. And then everything changed over the past few days, when the Leave camp was seen making dramatic gains in the polls, culminating with yesterday’s Opinium poll that has “Brexit” leading by a remarkable 19 points. That, and of course the 4 central bank meetings on deck, each of which has the capacity to shock and disappoint the markets if one of the world’s central banks says something that markets disagree with.
But right now it is all about the immediate fate of the UK, and as Bloomberg explains the “jolted markets” and overnight plunge in global risk assets, “growing anxiety over the prospect of the U.K. exiting the European Union dominated financial markets, sending global stocks down for a third day and the British pound to an eight-week low while boosting demand for havens such as the yen and gold.”
“There are many uncertainties, so we could continue seeing declines and touch new lows in the days to come,” said John Plassard, a senior equity-sales trader at Mirabaud Securities in Geneva. “Even though nobody is expecting a rate hike, everyone will look at what Yellen will say at the press conference, and we are 10 days from the Brexit vote, and also days away from the election in Spain, while oil is lower and volatility is the highest in months.”
As we showed last night, the number of hedge fund net short position on cable is the highest since the summer of 2013, which of course means that should the vote go against the “Leave” camp, the short squeeze will be nothing short of spectacular.
Meanwhile, Asia was ugly, with the Yen soaring to its May highs (and the all important USDJPY carry trade plunging as a result) while Asian stocks slumped between 2%-3.5% as investors dumped risk assets ahead of UK’s referendum. The surge in the Yen slammed Japan, and the Nikkei was down a whopping 3.5%, just north of 16,000 as concerns about Kuroda’s (and Abe’s) professional career and tenure mount. China’s Shanghai Composite tumbled the most since February, dropping 3.2%, which is hardly the move those expecting a surge on a potential inlusion of China in the MSCI Index were hoping for.
But the worst was in Europe, where equities headed for the lowest close since February and the pound weakened against all of its 16 major peers after polls showed the outcome of a referendum on whether Britain will stay in the EU was too close to call. The yen rose toward its strongest level since 2014, while the cost of insuring corporate debt against default increased to the highest in more than two months. Oil retreated after a report showed a jump in U.S. drilling rigs, while massively bullish positioning by spec investors threatens a wipeout if and when the selling begins.
And since this “market” …read more
Source: Global Stocks Plunge; US Futures, Oil Slide As Brexit Fears "Jolt Markets"
BR>
By Tyler Durden
Following Abe’s decision to delay the April 2017 increase in the consumption tax, warnings about Japan’s rating (recall that Japan’s consolidated debt/GDP ratio is the highest in the world at 400%) were inevitable, and moments ago Fitch was the first to come out and while “affirming” Japan’s AA rating, it was the first major agency to cut its outlook from Stable to Negative. Expect the other two big agencies to do the same, followed inevitably by downgrades.
For now, however, the market does not care the tiniest bit about Japan’s ruinous fundamentals, and instead just wants to frontrun the BOJ inevitable easing, as a result yields across the Japanese curve have dropped to fresh record lows.
Here is the full note:
Fitch Ratings-Hong Kong-13 June 2016: Fitch Ratings has affirmed Japan’s Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings at ‘A’ and revised the Outlooks to Negative. The issue ratings on Japan’s senior unsecured local-currency bonds are also affirmed at ‘A’. The Country Ceiling is affirmed at ‘AA’ and the Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR at ‘F1’.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The revision of the Outlooks on Japan’s IDRs to Negative from Stable reflects the following key rating drivers:
Source: Fitch Cuts Japan’s Credit Outlook To Negative
BR>
By Tyler Durden
Submitted by Michael Shedlock via MishTalk.com,
Not only does the EU have its hands full with a sudden surge in favor of Brexit, it also has to deal with a sudden surge in the popularity of Spain’s Eurosceptic “United We Can” party.
Center right Popular Party (PP) candidate and acting prime minister Mariano Rajoy was widely expected to gain seats following the failed election in 2015.
Recent polls shows PP is losing seats to the once fractured Podemos (We Can) party after it aligned with IU forming “United We Can”.
The above charts from El Pais.
The Financial Times reports Spain’s Once-Mighty Socialists Set to be Eclipsed by Far-Left.
The Spanish left is heading for a wrenching realignment at this month’s repeat general election, with a closely watched new poll suggesting that the centre-left Socialist party will be eclipsed by the far-left Unidos Podemos bloc.
With the official election campaign set to kick off at midnight on Thursday, Unidos Podemos was forecast to win 25.6 per cent of the vote and 88-92 seats in the 350-strong parliament.
The latest poll, by the respected state-funded CIS research institute, gave the once-mighty Socialists just 21.2 per cent and 78-80 seats. If confirmed on June 26, the day of the election, that shift would offer fresh evidence of the deepening crisis facing Europe’s embattled social democrats.
Last month, the anti-austerity Podemos party and the United Left, which includes Spain’s former Communist party, decided to set aside their rivalry and run on a joint list dubbed Unidos Podemos (United We Can). For the Socialists, the traditional standard-bearer of the left, the fallout from that deal appears to be highly damaging.
According to the CIS survey, the Socialists and Unidos Podemos could control as many as 172 seats in parliament, just four shy of an absolute majority. Meanwhile, the PP and the centrist, pro-business Ciudadanos party are predicted to win at most 160 seats between them.
But party leaders and analysts alike caution that the Socialists are deeply reluctant to throw in their lot with Unidos Podemos, especially if that alliance were to be led by Podemos chief Pablo Iglesias.
“I don’t see the Socialists supporting Iglesias as prime minister,” said José Fernández-Albertos, a political scientist at the CSIC research centre. “The more likely outcome is that they will abstain and let Rajoy govern [in minority] but will go into the opposition themselves. They will tell their supporters: We cannot support the PP but we also have to be responsible.”
Mathematically, it appears there will be another hung election.
None of the other parties like PP or its corrupt leader, Mariano Rajoy.
A three-way coalition between Unidos Podemos, PSOE, and Ciudadanos is the least likely outcome.
Undecided voters will determine the outcome.
El Pais reports the CIS survey shows 11% abstainers and 22% of respondents who have are undecided. Abstention on December 20 was 26.8%.
The undecideds will determine the outcome. And they appear to be breaking towards …read more
Source: Look Out EU – Eurosceptic "United We Can" Party Surging In Spain
BR>
“Hamilton’s” Tony performance will not use prop muskets following the mass shooting in Orlando on Sunday. …read more
Source: ‘Hamilton’ cast didn’t use prop guns at Tonys
BR>
By Tyler Durden
The now infamous “28-Pages” is well known to most everyone – for those that forget, the final chapter of a Congressional investigative report was classified and left out of the documents handed over to the 9/11 commission, who ultimately produced the final report. What's also well known is the fact that upon hearing that the US was opening back up this can of worms, the Saudis threatened to sell $750 billion worth of treasuries and other US assets.
Since those events, the US Senate has passed legislation that would allow 9/11 victims or surviving family members to sue Saudi Arabia, and numerous people have speculated on whether or not the 28-pages would be declassified and released for public consumption. Most recently, perhaps the most prominent figure to discuss the release of the 28-pages is none other than CIA Director John Brennan. One would imagine that Brennan would be in the know regarding the contents of those pages, and as Reuters reports, Brennan said on Sunday that he expects the pages will be released. Furthermore, Brennan said that people shouldn't take them as evidence of Saudi Arabia being complicit in the attacks.
From Al Arabiya
These so called 28 pages that were part of the joint inquiry that was published in 2002. Just a year after 9/11, was a very preliminary review trying to pull together bits and pieces of information reporting who was responsible for 9/11. Subsequently, the 9/11 commission looked very thoroughly at these allegations of Saudi involvement, Saudi government involvement and their finding, their conclusion was that there was no evidence to indicate that the Saudi government as an institution or Saudi, senior Saudi officials individually had supported the 9/11 attacks. So these 28 pages I believe are going to come out and I think it’s good that they come out. People shouldn’t take them as evidence of Saudi complicity in the attacks. Indeed subsequently the assessments that have been done have shown it was very unfortunate that these attacks took place but this was the work of al-Qaeda, al-Zawahiri, and others of that ilk.
According to Reuters, former US Senator Bob Graham, who co-chaired the congressional inquiry into the attacks and is a strong advocate of the release of the papers, said that the White House will likely make a decision by June on whether or not it woiuld release the classified documents.
Whether or not Brennan was being sincere or whether this was a well timed interview that said the right things remains to be seen. However, it would be a significant step in the right direction to have the public actually be able to read and decipher the truth for themselves for once instead of the government dictating what the public can or can't handle like small children.
Also, Congressman Justin Amash (R-MI) has a different take on the 28-pages than Brennan, although he too wants the public to be able to read the documents for themselves.
CIA director must be referring to different 28 …read more
Source: CIA Director John Brennan Believes The "28-Pages" Will Be Released & Quell Suspicion Of The Saudis
100% Pure Garcinia Cambogia Extract – Appetite Suppressant – Carb Blocker Capsules – 2100 MG – 90 Caps
Looking for something special ? Find The Lowest Price HERE
BR>
By Tyler Durden
Submitted by Douglas Murray via The Gatestone Institute,
The German Chancellor was not interested in the reinforcement of Europe's external borders, the re-erection of its internal borders, the institution of a workable asylum vetting system and the repatriation of people who had lied to gain entry into Europe. Instead, Chancellor Merkel wanted to know how Facebook's founder could help her restrict the free speech of Europeans, on Facebook and on other social media.
Then, on May 31, the European Union announced a new online speech code to be enforced by four major tech companies, including Facebook and YouTube.
It was clear from the outset that Facebook has a definitional problem as well as a political bias in deciding on these targets. What is Facebook's definition of 'racism'? What is its definition of 'xenophobia'? What, come to that, is its definition of 'hate speech'?
Of course the EU is a government — and an unelected government at that — so its desire not just to avoid replying to its critics — but to criminalise their views and ban their contrary expressions — is as bad as the government of any country banning or criminalising the expression of opinion which is not adulatory of the government.
People must speak up — must speak up now, and must speak up fast — in support of freedom of speech before it is taken away from them. It is, sadly, not an overstatement to say that our entire future depends on it.
It is nine months since Angela Merkel and Mark Zuckerberg tried to solve Europe's migrant crisis. Of course having caused the migrant crisis by announcing the doors of Europe as open to the entire third-world, Angela Merkel particularly would have been in a good position actually to try to solve this crisis.
But the German Chancellor was not interested in the reinforcement of Europe's external borders, the re-erection of its internal borders, the institution of a workable asylum vetting system and the repatriation of people who had lied to gain entry into Europe. Instead, Chancellor Merkel was interested in Facebook.
When seated with Mark Zuckerberg, Frau Merkel wanted to know how the Facebook founder could help her restrict the free speech of Europeans, on Facebook and on other social media. Speaking to Zuckerberg at a UN summit last September (and not aware that the microphones were picking her up) she asked what could be done to restrict people writing things on Facebook which were critical of her migration policy. 'Are you working on this?' she asked him. 'Yeah', Zuckerberg replied.
In the months that followed, we learned that this was not idle chatter over lunch. In January of this year, Facebook launched its 'Initiative for civil courage online', committing a million Euros to fund non-governmental organisations in its work to counter 'racist' and 'xenophobic' posts online. It also promised to remove 'hate speech' and expressions of 'xenophobia' from the Facebook website.
It was clear from the outset that Facebook has a definitional problem as well as a …read more
Source: The EU Is Coming To Close Down Your Free Speech
BR>
“Hamilton” won 11 Tonys, but came up one short of tying the record set by “The Producers.” …read more
Source: ‘Hamilton’ falls just short of history with 11 Tonys
